Management and quality of policy advisory systems in Kazakhstan: the case of public and private research organizations

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1093/polsoc/puaf025
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract In democratic societies, research organizations can offer key policy advice that serves governance and reform practice as part of the larger policy advisory systems (PASs). However, this is rarely the case in authoritarian states, where PASs operate in a distinct way, often with an aim to legitimize the authoritarian rule and ensure regime stability. This case study on the interface between the national government and research organizations that produce policy-relevant research in Kazakhstan demonstrates that researchers working in the authoritarian context often maintain the official state narrative, support regime-friendly policies, and are co-opted by the government through a variety of mechanisms. At the same time, there is space for dissent that is predicated on the financial and ideological independence of private research organizations.