Cardioprotective effects of the ranolazine in myocardial infarction mediated by stimulation of the endogenous mediators involved in ischemic preconditioning

Junaid Tantray, Francisco Sandro Menezes Rodrigues, José Mário Podanosque, Fernando Sabia Tallo, Afonso Caricati‐Neto, Ashish Kumar Sharma, Akhilesh Patel, Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Shivam Singh, Bolatkan Arlan Beibituly

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1590/acb410926
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hypothesis centered on the idea that ranolazine could induce responses similar to ischemic preconditioning, involving nitric oxide, adenosine, bradykinin, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent potassium channels. METHODS: Ischemia-reperfusion injury was established using Langendroff technique. Thirty-minute ischemia and 120-minute reperfusion to coronary artery to isolated heart were model of myocardial infarction. There were studied the following groups: control (ischemia-reperfusion), ischemic preconditioning, ranolazine (10 µmol/L), ranolazine + L-NAME (30 µmol/L) and ranolazine + aminoguanidine (30 µmol/L), ranolazine + theophylline (50 µmol/L), ranolazine + aminophylline (50 µmol/L), ranolazine + icatibantl (100 µmol/L), ranolazine + bromelain (250 µmol/L), ranolazine + 5-hydroxydecanoate (30 µmol/L), and ranolazine + glimepiride (50 µmol/L) in perfusate. RESULTS: Ranolazine and ischemic preconditioning groups demonstrated cardioprotective effects by reducing infarct size, as well as levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine phosphokinase myoglobin (CK-MB), and troponin I and cardiac parameters like left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and left ventricular maximum rate of contraction (dP/dTmax). Maximum rate of relaxation (dP/dTmin) was improved. Conversely, treatments with L-NAME, aminoguanidine, theophylline, aminophylline, icatibant, bromelain, 5-hydroxydecanoate, and glimepiride increased infarct size, LDH, CK-MB, and troponin I levels, and cardiac parameters like LVDP, dP/dTmax, and dP/dTmin were depressed. This data provides evidence that ranolazine employs nitric oxide, adenosine, bradykinin, and ATP-dependent potassium channels as secondary messengers in cardioprotection. CONCLUSION: ranolazine can be a pharmacological alternative to surgical ischemic preconditioning utilized prior to interventional procedures like coronary artery bypass graft surgery and heart transplantation, offering improved patient compliance.