Predicting Specific Anomaly Results using Machine Learning Algorithms

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/icce-asia67487.2025.11263772
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In this study, machine learning methods were applied to a UCI dataset on colic in horses, consisting of 300 cases and 28 clinical variables. Preprocessing included cleaning, imputation, categorical variable encoding, and standardization, followed by class balancing through augmentation. Feature evaluation was performed using the inflation coefficient of variance to mitigate multicollinearity, recursive feature elimination to rank attributes, and principal component analysis to assess redundancy. Logistic regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost models were trained and evaluated. XGBoost achieved the best results with an accuracy of 87.0% and an F1 score of 87.1%, followed by Random Forest with 85.3% and logistic regression with 71.0%. The results demonstrate the potential of ensemble methods for predictive modeling of colic in horses.