Structure and agency entanglement: contextualising the macro–micro dialectic in the multilingual language education policy in Balochistan, Pakistan

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/14790718.2025.2557435
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Situating the macro–micro dialectic in Pakistan’s multilingual language education policy context, this study examines the structure-agency entanglement around the implementation of the policy called ‘Introduction of Mother Languages as Compulsory Additional Subject Act’, enacted by the government of Balochistan province, Pakistan, in 2014. Grounded in the current macro–micro debates in Language Policy and Planning, the study draws on qualitative interviews with 12 schoolteachers across the province to analyze their response and positions towards the policy, the challenges they confront, and the adaptation strategies they adopt in implementation. Findings show that though the implementation of the policy is fraught with numerous challenges, teachers do exercise their agency which manifests in diverse forms, as they adapt, critique, and re-interpret the policy in ways that align with their classroom needs and contextual realities. We emphasise that teachers’ agentive responses should be viewed through a reformative lens rather than as outright opposition to government policies about the local mother tongues in public schools. This calls for a balanced analysis of the structure-agency tension – one that neither overestimates nor underestimates the role of agency or structure, recognising their intersection as dialectical rather than dichotomous. We conclude that both can coexist within a single policy or event.