Beyond digital access: citizen-centred public services in Central Europe

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.66608/2617-085x.2026.3.3.002
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Research problem: digitalisation has become a central instrument of public-administration reform, but the online availability of services does not necessarily make administrative journeys simple, inclusive or trusted. Research gap: comparative e-government studies often measure digital maturity and portal availability, while giving less attention to how Central European administrations transform digital access into integrated, accountable and citizen-centred service journeys. Objective: this article examines how digitalisation can support client- and citizen-centred public services in Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia and Croatia. Methodology: the study applies a qualitative comparative design based on documentary analysis and a structured review of public-administration literature; the analytical framework covers five dimensions: life-event service design, interoperability and the once-only principle, mobile and proactive delivery, inclusion and assisted access, and trust governance. Principal findings: the countries have moved beyond basic portal development, but progress remains uneven because strengths in digital identity, e-health, connectivity, skills, cybersecurity and life-event reform do not always coincide. Scientific novelty: the article proposes an integrated framework that links public value, administrative burden and digital-government maturity, shifting the analysis from the existence of digital channels to the quality, integration, accessibility and accountability of the full administrative journey. Practical implications: the study recommends life-event redesign, service-quality dashboards, institutionalisation of the once-only principle, assisted digital access, accountable mobile services, workforce reform, regional pilots and trust-by-design mechanisms.