AUTHOR'S GENDER POSITION AND NARRATION IN THE CREATION OF A FEMALE IMAGE

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32523/2616-678x-2026-156-3-178-189
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of authorial gender and narrative strategies in the literary representation of female figures in G. Musrepov’s Mother of Mothers, Ch. Aitmatov’s Jamilia, V. Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway, and T. Morrison’s Beloved. The study aims to identify artistic techniques used to construct female subjectivity, inner world, social role, and symbolic function. It employs comparative-typological analysis, close reading, and elements of gender and narratological analysis. The analysis focuses on motherhood, sacrifice, freedom, resistance, historical memory, social constraints, inner voice, and agency. The findings indicate that social, moral, and active dimensions of female characters are more pronounced in the works of the selected male authors, while female authors more extensively integrate consciousness, memory, and psychological experience into narrative structure. These differences are considered in relation to genre, historical context, cultural environment, and individual authorial poetics rather than attributed solely to gender. Reception is understood as a potential interpretive possibility generated by the text rather than an empirical reader response. The study’s novelty lies in treating authorial gender as one analytical dimension of comparative literary analysis rather than an isolated causal factor.