Between science, religion, and tradition: multiple forms of legitimation of occult practices in contemporary Kazakhstan

Frontiers in Political Science, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/fpos.2026.1895091
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Introduction This article examines the increasing visibility of occult knowledge and practices among the contemporary urban population of Kazakhstan and considers how these practices are interpreted in the context of accelerated catch-up modernization, institutional uncertainty, cultural continuity, and changing sources of authority. Methods The study employed an exploratory mixed-methods design comprising a self-selected online survey of urban residents ( n = 764), semi-structured in-depth interviews ( n = 10), and qualitative-quantitative content analysis of 375 media items from Kazakhstan’s digital space. Results Occult and esoteric practices carried multiple and often contradictory meanings within the sample, ranging from cultural tradition, psychological support, and personal orientation to commercial products, status resources, and alternative forms of action under uncertainty. A particularly important finding is that the same practices may be legitimated through overlapping scientific or quasi-scientific, religious, cultural-traditional, therapeutic, and commercial vocabularies rather than through a simple rational–irrational binary. Attitudes toward state regulation were similarly ambivalent, combining expectations of oversight and consumer protection with recognition of individual choice. Discussion The study does not establish a direct causal relationship between modernization and the prevalence of occult practices. Compensation theory is therefore treated as one interpretive framework among several, while the findings point more broadly to the coexistence and negotiation of multiple epistemic and institutional sources of authority in contemporary Kazakhstan.