Impact of Heterogeneous 5G Duplex Arrangements on Future Non-Terrestrial IoT Networks

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/s26196108
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Satellite direct-to-cell connectivity can extend 5G Internet of Things (IoT) services into areas without terrestrial coverage by reusing terrestrial mobile-service spectrum. This study examines aggregate interference at a non-terrestrial network (NTN) satellite receiver in selected bands within 694-2690 MHz, where terrestrial duplex arrangements differ between regions. A satellite receiving an uplink may also receive terrestrial downlink emissions from another country using TDD or an overlapping FDD downlink. Six geographical case studies combine satellite motion, population-based terrestrial deployments, and aggregate-interference calculations over a 180 kHz receiver bandwidth. Results are presented as interference-to-noise ratio (I/N) complementary cumulative distribution functions and geographical maps, with nadir and random off-nadir pointing cases. In the evaluated TDD cases, BS contributions dominate the upper part of the aggregate-interference distributions, and elevated interference extends beyond the emitting countries. These findings identify cross-border interference pathways under the assumed deployments, loading, spectral coupling, and antenna patterns. They do not establish that duplex arrangement outweighs deployment density independently of these assumptions. The adopted -6 dB I/N threshold is a screening reference; service availability, link performance, and the effectiveness of mitigation techniques are not evaluated.