Feminism Under Capture: Power, Voice, and the Reconstitution of Feminist Futures

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1111/gwao.70236
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

ABSTRACT What happens to feminism when it stops challenging power and starts circulating within it? As feminist language enters government agendas, global indicators, and market strategy, it becomes harder to tell whether feminism is transforming those systems or being absorbed by them. This editorial argues that the two are not sequential. Across contributions from Central Asia and beyond, we show feminist voice, agency, and solidarity being produced and constrained in the same moment they are exercised; not first captured, then resisted, but reshaped and redirected at once, through the very terms power extends. A woman using entrepreneurial visibility to gain legitimacy in a male‐dominated market is not complying and then subverting; she is doing both in a single gesture. Tracing this dynamic across Soviet and post‐Soviet Kazakhstan, global development governance, education, women's entrepreneurship, and decolonial epistemology, we ask what forms of feminist voice become legitimate, whose knowledge counts, and what survives translation into policy, indicator, and curriculum. We turn to the margins not as places where feminism is absent, but as the sites where its capture and its reinvention are most visible at once, where empowerment is relational rather than individual, solidarity is built through care and interdependence rather than declared as a political stance, and feminist theory is not applied to lived experience but built from it. The task this editorial sets is not to recover feminism from power, but to rethink what feminism becomes once the distinction between the two no longer holds.