Feminism Under Capture: Power, Voice, and the Reconstitution of Feminist Futures

2026

Закрытый доступ Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1111/gwao.70236
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

ABSTRACT What happens to feminism when it stops challenging power and starts circulating within it? As feminist language enters government agendas, global indicators, and market strategy, it becomes harder to tell whether feminism is transforming those systems or being absorbed by them. This editorial argues that the two are not sequential. Across contributions from Central Asia and beyond, we show feminist voice, agency, and solidarity being produced and constrained in the same moment they are exercised; not first captured, then resisted, but reshaped and redirected at once, through the very terms power extends. A woman using entrepreneurial visibility to gain legitimacy in a male‐dominated market is not complying and then subverting; she is doing both in a single gesture. Tracing this dynamic across Soviet and post‐Soviet Kazakhstan, global development governance, education, women's entrepreneurship, and decolonial epistemology, we ask what forms of feminist voice become legitimate, whose knowledge counts, and what survives translation into policy, indicator, and curriculum. We turn to the margins not as places where feminism is absent, but as the sites where its capture and its reinvention are most visible at once, where empowerment is relational rather than individual, solidarity is built through care and interdependence rather than declared as a political stance, and feminist theory is not applied to lived experience but built from it. The task this editorial sets is not to recover feminism from power, but to rethink what feminism becomes once the distinction between the two no longer holds.