A Discursive and Comparative Analysis of Phytonymic Symbols: Roses in English Folk Songs and Tulips in Kazakh Folk Songs

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.17507/jltr.1705.06
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify symbolic models in the discourse of English and Kazakh folk song texts and to demonstrate their common and distinctive features. To determine the study’s theoretical conclusions and directions, I identified the concepts of "discourse" and "song discourse" the differences between text and discourse are presented in tabular form. The phytonym symbols of roses and tulips, characteristic of the two linguocultures, were chosen as the research material. From the discourse of the English folk songs, a discursive analysis of 14 rose lexemes was conducted, and eight symbolic models were identified. From the discourse of the Kazakh folk songs, 22 tulip lexemes were analyzed, and six symbolic models were identified. The symbolic models were analyzed, common and distinctive features characteristic of the two linguocultures were identified, and conclusions were drawn.