An Evaluation on Mandatory Mediation in Turkish Law

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.62768/tbj/2025/15/2/08
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Mandatory mediation is a practice that obliges the parties to apply for mediation before filing a lawsuit in order to resolve the dispute. Mandatory mediation can be applied in three different forms: court-related, semi-compulsory and as a cause of action. In Turkish law, applying to mediation is one of the causes of action in certain disputes such as labour disputes, commercial disputes, consumer disputes and lease disputes, disputes arising from neighbourhood law, and dissolution of partnership. In this type of mediation, the Parties can terminate the mediation process at any time after attending the first meeting. Mandatory mediation reduces the cost of disputes by reducing the workload of the courts. It also allows faster resolution of disputes and encourages the public to apply for voluntary mediation by increasing the recognition of mediation. However, in order to achieve these objectives, it is important that a culture of reconciliation is sufficiently developed in a society.