Comparing digital citizen science and traditional fieldwork instruction in pre-service biology teacher training in Kazakhstan

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/00958964.2026.2699686
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study examines whether using a digital, field-based instructional methodology that integrates platforms such as iNaturalist and eMammal enhances key learning outcomes among 300 pre-service biology teachers in Kazakhstan. Using a quasi-experimental pre/post design, we compared the performance of a group using the digital methodology with that of a group receiving traditional instruction across three primary outcomes: species identification accuracy, data analysis skills, and engagement and satisfaction with learning. Students who participated in the digital methodology demonstrated greater improvements in species identification and stronger development of data analysis and interpretation skills compared with those in the traditional approach, as well as higher levels of engagement and satisfaction. These results imply that combining digital tools with structured fieldwork can facilitate deeper learning and reinforce the competencies necessary for effective biodiversity education. The study highlights the pedagogical value of technology-enhanced field instruction and its potential to enhance conservation-oriented biology education training.