Comparing Volunteer Service Education in Universities of China and Kazakhstan: Cultural Foundations, Institutional Mechanisms, Curriculum Integration

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/jes872202614
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Volunteer service education is increasingly recognised as a key pathway for cultivating socially responsible undergraduates with global perspectives. This study compares university-based volunteer service education in China and Kazakhstan, focusing on cultural foundations, institutional mechanisms, curriculum integration, and educational outcomes. Drawing on document analysis and faculty surveys from six universities (n = 144), the findings show that China operates a centralised, policy-driven model closely aligned with ideological education, while Kazakhstan adopts a hybrid approach shaped by traditional asar mutual-aid values and international cooperation. China demonstrates stronger institutional frameworks and curriculum integration; Kazakhstan emphasises affective engagement and global partnerships. Despite these differences, both systems face common challenges such as limited resources, weak evaluation mechanisms, and short project durations. The study contributes to institutional isomorphism and service-learning theories by illustrating how local traditions, national priorities, and global norms intersect in shaping civic education. Practical recommendations are provided to strengthen policy support, curriculum integration, and cross-border collaboration. Keywords: Volunteer service education, service-learning, institutional isomorphism, cross-cultural comparison, China and Kazakhstan.