Entrepreneurship, Inequality, and Multidimensional Poverty: Rethinking the Role of SMEs in a Transition Economy

Economies, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/economies14070288
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

How SME development affects poverty reduction and income inequality remains a contested issue, particularly in transition economies characterized by structural and regional disparities. Existing studies often treat SMEs as a homogeneous phenomenon. As a result, evidence on the relationship between SME development, multidimensional poverty, and income inequality remains limited. This study examines the relationship between SME development, multidimensional poverty, and income inequality across 15 regions of Kazakhstan during 2005–2024 using panel data and Driscoll–Kraay estimators. Poverty is assessed using incidence, depth, and severity. SME development is measured using indicators capturing quantitative expansion and qualitative contribution. The findings identify unemployment and income inequality as the most robust drivers of poverty. Income growth reduces poverty depth and severity but is also associated with higher income inequality. SME development exhibits heterogeneous socioeconomic effects. Indicators reflecting SME value added are associated with lower poverty and inequality, whereas increases in the number of enterprises or SME output do not necessarily improve social outcomes and may be linked to higher poverty intensity. The results indicate that the developmental impact of SMEs depends on productivity, value creation, and structural transformation rather than enterprise quantity, highlighting the importance of quality-oriented SME policies for inclusive growth.