Arabic-Persian Borrowings In Political Terminology: A Comparative Analysis Of Turkish And Kazakh

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.71078/20g7py63
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines Arabic-Persian borrowings in the political vocabulary of Turkish and Kazakh, two Turkic languages that shared a common historical substrate but followed divergent paths of standardisation during the twentieth century. Drawing on comparative-historical and lexical-semantic analysis, the study traces the etymological origins of a set of attested political terms, documents their phonological and morphological adaptation, and accounts for differences in their modern usage. The analysis shows that Arabic-Persian elements constitute a significant historical layer in both terminological systems, but that deliberate lexical replacement in Turkey and Soviet-period standardisation in Kazakhstan produced structurally distinct outcomes. These divergences carry implications for cross-linguistic interpretation in political and institutional discourse.