Тенденции изучения дерадикализации: библиографический анализ

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.48010/60qvqm69
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The rising threat of violent extremism and growing global instability have led to increased interest in deradicalization in recent years. There has been an expansion of research on this topic, featuring various approaches and studies from different fields. This highlights the need to systemize knowledge on deradicalization. The study aimed to identify key trends in deradicalization research through a bibliometric analysis over the past few decades. The database is based on Scopus articles, and the methodology includes bibliometric analysis using a keyword search query. The selection of articles followed the PRISMA guidelines. During the research, VOSviewer and R Studio were used for analysis and visualization, which revealed thematic clusters and institutional research centers. The findings indicated that deradicalization was not a highly relevant topic for many years until 2015, when it became non-cyclical. Publication activity began to rise in 2015 and continues to grow, becoming more institutionalized. The analysis of the most cited articles identified three main areas: psychological models of radicalization and deradicalization, empirical studies of exit and reintegration programs, and challenges related to the digital environment and evolving political strategies. Further, the thematic analysis showed that three key concepts remain stable: “radicalization”, “deradicalization”, and “terrorism”. Supporting terms focus on several areas, including gender studies, legal aspects, and online radicalization. The results highlight the interdisciplinary nature of deradicalization and suggest opportunities for further research in comparative, gender, and digital studies.