ДИСКУРСТЫҚ ТӘЖІРИБЕДЕГІ ЭТНОМӘДЕНИ АҚПАРАТТЫҢ МАҢЫЗЫ

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.62724/202620205
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article analyzes the significance of ethnocultural information in discursive practice. Discursive and social experience play a crucial role in the formation of the linguistic-cultural, communicative, and discursive competencies of a linguistic personality, as these forms of experience ensure the intergenerational transmission of ethnocultural information embedded in the content of linguistic units. Drawing on the studies of É Benveniste, M. Bakhtin, T. van Dijk, and N. Uali, the author examines the concepts of discourse, discursive experience, ethnocultural information, and linguocultural content, interpreting discourse as a form of language actualization in a social context and analyzing its function in transmitting social experience and ethnocultural information. The aim of the article is to determine the role of ethnocultural content transmitted through discursive practice in the formation of linguocultural competence. The objectives include analyzing the relationship between discursive and social experience and identifying the functions of ethnocultural units in literary texts. The research material comprises explanatory and phraseological dictionaries as well as excerpts from literary texts. The study employs descriptive, contextual, semantic, and discourse analysis methods. The scientific value of the study lies in identifying discursive experience as a decisive factor in the formation of a linguistic personality, while its practical significance is determined by the applicability of the results in discourse studies and linguocultural studies.