Between chaos and history: how to combine the author's idea and algorithmic randomness in modern narrative design

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26503/dl.v2026i2.2781
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Game worlds are expanding in scale, yet the pursuit of vast environments often conflicts with the need for deep, personal narratives. This study addresses the dilemma of combining carefully constructed scenarios with procedurally generated landscapes, quests, and events. While games like Hades (Supergiant Games 2020) and Dwarf Fortress (Bay 12 Games 2022) demonstrate successful integration, these remain the exception rather than the rule. This paper proposes a systemic framework—the «Anchors and Ornaments» model—to weave authorial narrative into the algorithmic fabric of games. Through a comparative analysis of successful design techniques, we demonstrate that the conflict between narrative and procedure can be reconsidered as a design tension rather than a strict opposition; the true challenge lies in designing narrative systems where the author defines rules, emotions, and conflicts, while the algorithm acts as a co-author. The proposed model provides designers with practical tools to create games that achieve both scale and depth