Research methods courses in Kazakhstan’s teacher education: between policy aspirations and practice

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/02619768.2026.2680929
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

As a member of the Bologna process, Kazakhstan strives to align its education system with European standards. In teacher education, these standards formalise research as the cornerstone of the evidence-based teaching profession. This logic is also emphasised in Kazakhstan’s policies. In response to these policies, universities have introduced research methods courses (RMCs) as a central curricular mechanism for cultivating inquiring teachers. With a focus on their goals, design, pedagogy, and limitations, this study examines how these courses contribute to the development of evidence-based teaching in the country. Drawing upon individual interviews with instructors of RMCs, we found that these courses largely represent symbolic compliance rather than the substantial transformation intended by policy. This policy-practice gap is rooted in teacher educators’ epistemic beliefs and limited research capacity, inadequate organisational support, and broader structural pressures. We argue that a more holistic approach is needed to establish a research-based teaching profession in Kazakhstan.