Value of employees in the framework of labor processes within Soviet and post-Soviet metallurgical enterprises: Kazakhstan’s specifics of human capital

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51582/interconf.19-20.02.2026.001
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Soviet and subsequently Kazakhstan’s metallurgy (as a part of it) developed for a longer period within the framework of the Marxist economic doctrine of planned management (outside the capitalist formation) and therefore outside the framework of the classically understood “theory of human capital”. Despite this fact, it should be considered that the economic system where the industry originated and existed was based on the socialist principles of personnel management. Moreover, this means that there really was a human-centricity (in this system), not because of individualism, but based on the collectivistic principle, which was based on the proletarian class. However, was this system better than the capitalist "worker exploitation system" or did it have similar problematic aspects itself, based on the exploitation of both "class enemies" and Soviet citizens? This reviewing article is presented in order to answer this question.