The Role of International Mediators in Global Conflict Resolution

Akerke Raiymbekova, Adilbek Yermekbayev, Gulnash Askhat

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1111/polp.70137
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The study analyzes the role of international mediators in resolving contemporary conflicts in the post‐Soviet space, Central Asia, and the Middle East. The purpose of this research is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of various strategies of international mediation in the context of an evolving geopolitical landscape. The study examines the theoretical foundations and contemporary approaches to international mediation, exploring various mediation models, including the facilitative, evaluative, transformative, and narrative models. Particular attention is given to assessing the effectiveness of mediation efforts in conflicts such as Nagorno‐Karabakh, Syria, and Russia‐Ukraine. The findings reveal a significant evolution in mediation approaches, shifting from traditional models of neutral mediation towards more comprehensive strategies. The study underscores the critical role of cultural context and the necessity of considering historical factors when formulating conflict resolution strategies. The research highlights the need to develop adaptive approaches to international mediation to effectively address the challenges of complex geopolitical situations. Related Articles Ben‐Meir, A. 2023. “Psychological Impediments are at the Core of the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict.” Politics & Policy 51, no. 3: 488–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12535 . Macaulay, C. 2022. “Conflict Settlement and Identity in Territorial Claims.” Politics & Policy 50, no. 6: 1155–1176. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12493 . Tusalem, R. F. 2015. “Ethnic Minority Governments, Democracy, and Human Rights.” Politics & Policy 43, no. 4: 502–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12125 .