Evaluating Large Language Models for Kazakh Question Generation: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Gemma

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/icecco67619.2026.11488827
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study compares two well-known big language models, ChatGPT and Gemma, to assess the quality of autonomously generated multiple-choice questions in Kazakh. We created questions using eight different configurations that varied by model, prompt language (English vs. Kazakh), source text language, and generation technique (direct vs. translation), all based on the historical book The Nomads by Ilyas Esenberlin. A 5-point Likert scale measuring fluency, clarity, and syntax was used to evaluate 48 questions from 577 Kazakh-speaking respondents in three surveys. The findings show that while ChatGPT slightly outperformed Gemma (3.95 vs. 3.86,$p=0.15$), Kazakh-prompted questions scored much higher than Englishprompted questions (4.00 vs. 3.81,$\mathrm{p} \leq 0.01$). Translation was inferior to direct generation (3.96 vs. 3.85,$p=0.10$). These results have significant implications for the development of educational technologies in the Kazakh language as well as lowresource language NLP applications.