Multidimensional Service Quality in Private English Course Institutions: A Student Perception-Based Evaluation

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.37251/jolle.v2i2.2895
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This study aims to evaluate multidimensional service quality in a private English course institution based on students’ perceptions and to categorize the performance level of each service dimension using percentage-based evaluation criteria. Methodology: This study employed a quantitative descriptive design using a structured Likert-scale questionnaire consisting of ten service quality dimensions. Data were collected through a survey of active students using total sampling. Data analysis applied descriptive statistical techniques and percentage calculations to classify service performance into categorical levels. Main Findings: The findings indicate that overall service quality is categorized as good to very good. The highest ratings were obtained in official certificates and diplomas, effective small-class systems, and course consultant facilities. Replacement class availability received the lowest percentage, although still categorized as good, indicating areas requiring service optimization. Novelty/Originality of this study: This study offers an integrated multidimensional service quality evaluation model specifically for private English course institutions using percentage-based categorical mapping. It advances existing research by combining academic, infrastructural, administrative, financial, and certification dimensions into a unified and practical institutional performance framework.