Spatial organization and concentration of tourist accommodation in the Eastern Kazakhstan region

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.59649/2959-5185-2026-1-28-38
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article analyzes the spatial structure of tourist accommodations in the East Kazakhstan region based on the dynamics of the number of accommodations by stable administrative units from 2020 to 2024. The purpose of the study is to identify the degree of territorial differentiation, concentration, and typological differences in the development of accommodation infrastructure. The methodological basis includes descriptive statistics and the assessment of dynamics by territory, calculation of spatial concentration indices (Herfindahl–Hirschman index) and distribution unevenness (Gini coefficient), as well as clustering of territories based on a combination of average level, relative change, and variability of the indicator. The results confirm the structural transformation of the space: a core of territories with a high level of provision of accommodation facilities is forming, while peripheral areas with low values and limited dynamics are being preserved. Concentration and unevenness indicators show that the structural “framework” of distribution is being preserved, with a tendency toward increasing differences between groups of territories. The proposed typology (core-semi-periphery-periphery) can be used to justify differentiated management decisions in regional tourism policy and to prioritize infrastructure development measures.