Methodological Requirements for Using Electronic Educational Resources in Teaching Mathematical Disciplines

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.18178/ijiet.2026.16.4.2559
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The integration of Electronic Educational Resources (EERs) into teaching is reshaping educational methodologies, especially in mathematical disciplines. However, there remains a gap in understanding the specific methodological requirements that ensure the effective use of these resources. This study was conducted across diverse educational settings, employing both quantitative and qualitative research methods to assess the application and efficacy of EERs in mathematical education. Our empirical data revealed that students’ comprehension and engagement in mathematical subjects significantly improved with EERs. However, this enhancement was most pronounced when EERs incorporated specific methodological considerations such as content design, interactivity, and feedback mechanisms. The study employed a pre-post intervention design with paired t-tests. Quantitative analysis revealed a statistically significant improvement in student perceptions (pre-intervention M = 3.2, post-intervention M = 4.5 on a 5-point scale; p < 0.001) and test scores (68% to 82%; p <0.001), with large effect sizes (Cohen’s d = 1.45 and 1.32, respectively). The results demonstrate EERs’ effectiveness when implemented with pedagogical alignment, though outcomes varied by students’ prior tech familiarity (r = 0.42, p < 0.01). These findings support technology-enhanced learning theories while highlighting the need for tailored implementation strategies to address accessibility disparities. The findings underscore the need for educators to adopt pedagogical strategies that align with the unique characteristics of EERs. The paper presents a comprehensive framework that educators can use as a guideline for effectively integrating technology into mathematical education. The proposed framework combines Curriculum Design, Teacher Training, Policy Decisions.