A Comparative Analysis of Semantic and Structural Differences Between Original and Translated Texts

Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.18172/cif.6850
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The relevance of this study stems from the need to examine semantic and structural differences in translated texts to ensure their effective adaptation for international audiences. This process must take into account the cultural characteristics of the target readership to prevent misunderstandings and cultural loss. The primary aim of this study is to analyse the structural and semantic features of poetic texts by A. Kunanbaev as translated into Russian and English. By comparing semantic and structural changes across translations, the study identifies key trends in literary translation. These changes are traced through lexical translation techniques such as concretisation, generalisation, semantic development, holistic transformation, contextual substitution, omission, and intonational substitution. The analysis reveals that translations into English tend to favour generalisation and structural transformation, while Russian translations more often employ concretisation, contextual substitution, and retention of poetic form. This distinction reflects broader linguistic and cultural proximities between Kazakh and Russian. The study also considers how cultural realia are treated across target languages, highlighting differences in domestication and foreignization strategies. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how semantic and structural shifts mediate the transmission of cultural and poetic meaning in translation.