Conclusion

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1007/978-94-6265-711-3_14
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the core arguments and overarching vision of the textbook, emphasizing the need for a reimagined legal theory in post-Soviet states—one that views law not merely as a tool of state power but as a societal institution grounded in values, justice, and pluralism. It revisits each chapter’s contribution to this framework, from the theoretical foundations to the practical mechanisms of legal interpretation, behavior, and responsibility. The chapter reinforces the central thesis: that legal reform in the region requires both a critical break from statist-positivist legacies and a forward-looking embrace of legal culture, civil society, and rule-of-law principles. The author calls on academics, educators, and legal practitioners to engage with these ideas, not as final answers but as starting points for further dialogue and transformation. The book closes with the hope that it will serve as both a teaching resource and a catalyst for meaningful legal development across post-Soviet societies.