Bureaucratic culture and research ethics: Case studies in post-Soviet Central Asia

Research Ethics, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1177/17470161251406342
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, 15 newly independent states sought to establish national policy systems distinct from their shared past. Yet, many features of governance in these post-Soviet contexts continue to mirror the bureaucratic traditions of the former regime. This paper examines the governance of research ethics as a lens to understand the persistence and transformation of bureaucratic culture in three Central Asian countries—Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan. While these states have articulated ambitions to modernise and internationalise their research sectors, the study finds that deeply embedded bureaucratic norms continue to shape institutional practices, constraining genuine reform and innovation. The analysis highlights how Soviet-era administrative legacies endure within contemporary research governance, limiting the development of autonomous and ethically robust research environments.