Non-Imaging Differential Diagnosis of Lower Limb Osteoarthritis: An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework

Algorithms, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/a19010087
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent chronic degenerative disorder, with coxarthrosis (hip OA) and gonarthrosis (knee OA) representing its most significant clinical manifestations. While diagnosis typically relies on imaging, such methods can be resource-intensive and insensitive to early disease trajectories. Objective: This study aims to achieve the differential diagnosis of coxarthrosis and gonarthrosis using solely routine preoperative clinical and laboratory data, benchmarking state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 893 patients (617 with knee OA, 276 with hip OA) from a clinical hospital in Almaty, Kazakhstan. The study evaluated a diverse portfolio of models, including gradient boosting decision trees (LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost), deep learning architectures (RealMLP, TabDPT, TabM), and the pretrained tabular foundation model RealTabPFN v2.5. Results: The RealTabPFN v2.5 (Tuned) model achieved superior performance, recording a mean ROC–AUC of 0.9831, accuracy of 0.9485, and an F1-score of 0.9474. SHAP interpretability analysis identified heart rate (66.2%) and age (18.1%) as the dominant predictors driving the model’s decision-making process. Conclusion: Pretrained tabular foundation models demonstrate exceptional capability in distinguishing OA subtypes using limited clinical datasets, outperforming traditional ensemble methods. This approach offers a practical, high-performance triage tool for primary clinical assessment in resource-constrained settings.