Strategic hybridity: National modernization and cultural security in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2025hph4/241-250
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article provides a philosophical analysis of cultural security in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan under the conditions of globalization, introducing the concept of “strategic hybridity”. The study critically examines the application of the theories of homogenization, glocalization, and hybridization. It demonstrates that none of these paradigms, taken in isolation, can fully capture the complex cultural dynamics of the region; rather, their dialectical interplay becomes evident. The phenomenon of “McDonaldization” is shown to encounter axiological resistance from local traditions of hospitality and social practices. Glocalization is analyzed as a process manifested in cultural initiatives aimed at constructing a national brand. “Strategic hybridity” is con-ceptualized as the conscious selection, adaptation, and recoding of global cultural forms in order to address the tasks of national modernization and reinforce renewed identity. The empirical basis includes comparative analysis of cultural strategies, patterns of digital media consumption, as well as case studies in music (Q-pop, KG-pop) and the fashion industry in both countries. The conclusion asserts that Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan are shaping a “third way” between Westernization and isolationism, transforming the resources of globaliza-tion into instruments of their cultural projects, thereby ensuring cultural security in the new era.