Formation of personality in the context of the mythological form of spiritual communication from the archetype to mass culture

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2025hph4/287-293
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The formation of personality in the historical process is closely connected with the evolution of forms of spir-itual communication, among which myth occupies a special place. The mythological form of conveying meanings is not only an archaic means of symbolic mastering of reality, but also an active mechanism of so-cialization, identification and formation of the individual’s worldview in modern socio-cultural conditions. The article examines the key theoretical interpretations of myth (C. Levi-Strauss, R. Barthes, C.G. Jung, M.Eliade), focusing on its structural, cognitive and ideological functions. Particular attention is paid to therole of archetypes and their impact on the unconscious levels of consciousness, ensuring the continuity of cul-tural models. Modern forms of mythological thinking are analyzed, especially in popular culture, includingTV series, cinema and literature, where myth acts as a form of symbolic order that allows individuals to struc-ture their reality and find meaning in conditions of fragmentation. The thesis is substantiated that mythologyremains an active element of spiritual life, capable of adapting to new media environments and cultural con-texts. Myth is not just a relic, but a universal language of meanings that ensures the integration of personalexperience into collective consciousness.