«Тірі білім» ілімі: Абай және Ақымет Байтұрсынұлы тұжырымдарының әлем ойшылдары қағидаларымен сабақтастығы

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.71078/986gh958
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines the conceptual views of Abai and Akhmet Baitursynuly related to the doctrine of “living knowledge” and identifies their intersections with global philosophical traditions concerning the nature of knowledge. The study provides a comprehensive analysis of the phenomenon of “living knowledge” in connection with ancient foundational theories grounded in human experience, spiritual growth, and personal development. A comparative discussion is offered on Abai’s interpretation of intellectual and spiritual maturity as the central purpose of learning and Baitursynuly’s understanding of knowledge as a socio-moral force shaping national consciousness. The authors reveal universal philosophical principles and civilizational parallels embedded in their ideas, thereby expanding the broader conceptualization of “living knowledge.” Furthermore, the article substantiates the relevance of Abai’s and Baitursynuly’s perspectives for contemporary education, particularly in addressing issues of personal development, value-oriented instruction, and the cultivation of critical and creative thinking. The findings demonstrate that the concept of “living knowledge” retains significant relevance for modern pedagogical discourse.