The Cognitive Origin of Taboos and Common Roots

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.30564/fls.v7i12.12038
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article discusses the linguocognitive value and meaning of taboo, which in linguistics refers to ethnographic lexis, and analyzes its semantic structure. Lexical units in the vocabulary of a language are abstracted in the mind through deep linguistic structures, logical, psychological, philosophical, social, etc., foundations formed in the linguistic consciousness, and are reflected in the language through a cognitive model. As we know, taboo is a forbidden word and action. Language is a product of centuries-old human knowledge and human consciousness. Taboo words and their interpretation help to understand the meaning of folk customs. The main goal of the work is to examine cognitive phenomena in the language in close connection with the formation of the spiritual world of people speaking that language - their thinking, language consciousness, and the national consciousness that develops on its basis. The article considered the meaning of prohibitions and their common roots. The linguocognitive, linguocultural, and educational significance of taboos is explained on the basis of the continuity of taboos in cognition and tradition. Research methods: ethnolinguistic, comparative-descriptive, lexicographical selection. According to the results of the study, words that are prohibited from being mentioned are considered separately from euphemisms, which indicates their special cultural and cognitive significance. Despite the grammatical differences, we conclude that there are some common features between Kazakh and English. The research highlighted the ethnolinguistic nature of words and compared their existence in different languages.