A multinational megastudy of the effects of gratitude practices on subjective well-being

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2537789123
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Scholars have observed people from a variety of cultures using a variety of gratitude-related practices to change their emotions, outlooks, and social relationships. Across 34 countries purposefully sampled to cover a broad set of cross-cultural differences (total N = 10,772), we experimentally tested the effects of 6 popular gratitude practices on subjective moods, life outlooks, and social evaluations. Consistent with multiple theoretical accounts, gratitude practices produced immediate (but small) improvements in positive affect (d = 0.36), negative affect (d = -0.22), optimism (d = 0.24), life satisfaction (d = 0.11), indebtedness (d = 0.15), and envy (d = -0.16). Notably, these effects varied across different gratitude practices (0.00 < τpractice < 0.08) and countries (0.10 < τcountry < 0.19). For instance, based on existing evidence, stakeholders can expect gratitude interventions deployed in a randomly-selected country to improve positive affect – but not our other measured outcomes. To guide future inquiry into why this might be the case, we provide exploratory Bayesian estimates of the importance of 12 types of cross-cultural differences.