Voter (De)Mobilization

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197777497.013.0022
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract This chapter explores the relationship between voter (de)mobilization and electoral integrity. While voter mobilization is essential for increasing turnout and ensuring fair representation, selective strategies that target specific groups or demobilize opposition can undermine electoral integrity. Using the calculus of voting framework, the chapter analyzes how political actors manipulate the perceived costs and benefits of voting to prioritize partisan gains over equitable participation. It highlights how voter suppression laws, clientelism, and electoral violence are employed to manipulate turnout, threatening political equality and fairness. By comparing voter (de)mobilization practices in both old and new democracies, the chapter reveals how these strategies can either strengthen or erode the integrity of electoral systems, depending on the broader sociopolitical environment. The conclusion emphasizes the need to address these manipulative tactics to protect the democratic process and safeguard electoral integrity, ensuring more just and fair representation for all.