Chinese global governance as a diffusion process

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.2478/ecdip-2025-0001
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract This paper offers a conceptual framework to interpret the diffusion of Chinese global governance. Global governance is identified as a crucial aspect of China’s economic statecraft, especially as a means to develop and maintain international trade and investment. The adoption of Chinese global governance norms and rules is conceptualized as a diffusion process in which global governance is the innovation. Diffusion is a spatial-temporal process. Adoption over time is conceptualized as an adoption-curve of early-, mid-, and late adopters. Space is conceptualized as core, semi-periphery, and periphery regions of the capitalist world-economy. The forms of global governance are identified as either the politics of inter-state cooperation or the politics of domestic development. The policy focus of these two types of politics rests on an understanding of hegemony that requires dominance in the fields of manufacturing, trade, and investment. In addition to these economic spheres, global governance must address emerging crises, such as global climate change or war. Combining scales of global governance, the geography of core, semi-periphery, and periphery, and the policy focus of global governance rules and norms produces a 2*3*4 cube of 24 cells. Countries may be situated within one of these cells to understand their alacrity or hesitation in adopting Chinese global governance practices. The conceptual framework is illustrated through three vignettes describing China’s relations with Ghana and Zambia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, and Hungary.