PHILOSOPHICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE TRANSLATION PROBLEM: GUIDELINES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

2024

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.48081/aavr8733
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Translation in the narrow sense consists in expressing the meaning of one language in another language. Language is a carrier of meaning, and translation focuses on meaning. However, the above argument immediately raised a deep philosophical question - what is the relationship between the medium and the meaning? In particular, it is a question of whether the value is a carrier, and speech is a carrier of meaning. It is a metaphor or just a model that allows us to understand the relationship between meaning and language. In this model, meaning and language are two different objects that can be separated. The former is related to the latter, with the former being abstract and the latter being concrete. Such philosophical questions are widespread. The methodological basis of the research was philosophical works revealing the dialogical nature of translation activities; research on the philosophy of education; works in the field of text understanding; as well as research by philosophers in the field of ethnic culture and communication.