About problem of classification of forensic philological expertise

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.46914/2959-4197-2024-1-4-13-18
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article deals with the question of the inexpediency of giving the status of forensic philological expertise to the status of psychological-philological expertise, taking into account the material under study and the areas of competence of a philologist and a psychologist. The author acquaints the audience with the content of discussions in the Russian scientific and expert community about the mandatory involvement of psychologists in the analysis of the semantic content of information materials and raises the question about the need to revise the position of forensic philological expertise in the Kazakh classification of forensic examinations.