INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT AND STATE FINANCING FOR RESEARCH ON CONFLICTS: EFFORTS TO SUSTAINLONG-TERM PEACE POST-2020

2024

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.48371/ismo.2024.58.4.013
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Purposeof the Research: This article is dedicated to analyzing Kazakhstan's state policy in managing intercommunal conflicts after 2020. This period is marked by a significant increase in government spending on research initiatives and the establishment of specialized state institutions aimed at sustaining long-term peace. The study focuses on changes in financial and institutional spheres designed to prevent and resolve conflicts.The research employs a qualitative approach, including an analysis of state policies through the examination of regulatory documents and strategic development programs. Additionally, in-depth interviews with public officials were conducted, providing insights into the practical implementation of these policies. To enhance the qualitative analysis, quantitative data—particularly information on grants allocated by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education—was utilized. This helped analyze shifts in the distribution and volume of funding aimed at fostering peace and harmony in Kazakhstani society.The unique value of this study lies in theuse of new data that has not previously been introduced into academic discourse. These data provide a fresh perspective on the Kazakhstani government's approaches to managing intercommunal relations. Moreover, the authors emphasize the comprehensive nature of changesoccurring in the post-crisis period, including institutional and financial redistribution.