FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF FIFTY YEARS OF STUDY

2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52123/1994-2370-2024-1338
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract. Investment activities in the Republic of Kazakhstan are fraught with significant corruption risks, stemming from imperfect legislation and the intricacies of bureaucratic procedures involved in implementing investment projects. This article aims to investigate the role of the prosecutor's office in preventing corruption within the realm of private investment in Kazakhstan. To achieve this objective, an analysis of regulatory legal documents governing the prosecutor's office's mandate to safeguard the interests of private investors in Kazakhstan was conducted. Additionally, a content analysis of publications detailing successful cases of investor support within the prosecutor's office was undertaken. The study culminates in an evaluation of the effectiveness of this anticorruption mechanism as an alternative to the utilization of corrupt practices by private enterprises in their interactions with authorities. Keywords: corruption, investment, protection of investors, prosecutor’s office, anti-corruption mechanism.