SUBSTANTIVIZATION OF PARTICIPIAL FORMS IN KAZAKH WORD FORMATION

2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.59102/kufil/2024/iss4pp22-32
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Although the theory of substantivization has been considered in Kazakh linguistics since the first half of the twentieth century, there are numerous unresolved issues. For instance, the substantivization of pronouns, adverbs, and numerals remain to be poorly studied. Consequently, in our article, we examined the substantivization of participial forms and delineated the principal indicators that elucidate the nature of substantivization. Furthermore, the ways of formation and the scope of application of names derived from substantivized participles. The main purpose of this article is to elucidate substantivized participles from the cognitive basis, delineate their word-forming and functional nature. The article is based on scientific opinions, principles, theoretical concepts and notions related to substantivization in linguistics. The names created by the forms of substantivized participles were analysed, and their function in the sentence was considered. Furthermore, substantivised words were regarded conditionally as fully and partially substantivised ones.