Kazakhstani Simultaneous Interpreters’ Perceptions Concerning Interpretation Techniques and Tools

2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.30564/fls.v6i6.7140
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study examines the key issues of simultaneous interpretation from the practitioners’ viewpoint. It is framed within the context of interpreters’ competences and the main tools and strategies like probability forecasting, segmentation, simultaneous interpreters deal with under Kazakhstani multilingual conditions. To analyze those issues, the authors used such data collection tools as semi-structured interviews with the practitioners as well as interpreters’ introspection which unveil some techniques used by interpreters consciously and unconsciously. The validity and reliability of the research were verified by ANOVA. Consequently, the main research objective is to show the interpreters’ opinion concerning the main issues of simultaneous interpretation process, so it will be valuable for both in-service and pre-service interpreters as they conduct the introspective analysis of the working process and results; also, it reveals some problems interpreters face to while doing their work. Such phenomena as probability forecasting, compression technique, segmentation of the source texts and others related to simultaneous interpretation are observed by practitioners who demonstrate both their attitude and necessity of their academic upgrading. Also, one of the main findings of our study is related to the interpreters’ reflection concerning such tool of their work as auditory speech recognition.