Optimal Bargaining and Moral Hazard

2024

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47344/z7ewnh34
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In this paper we attempt to find the answer to the question of how the professional boxers behave ex post to additional money share negotiated ex ante. We find that for each fighter under a certain stake threshold there is an incentive to put in huge efforts for the forthcoming fight and that above that threshold, the opposite is true leading to a phenomenon of moral hazard. We also find that bargaining is successful in the absence of moral hazard. Finally, the optimal effort of the fighter will increase (decrease) for his (his opponents’) additional outside option.