A validity exploration model related to the existence of the generic problem-solving competence

2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.21014/actaimeko.v13i3.1338
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

There has been a growing focus on exploring the existence of Generic Problem-Solving competence across various fields, leading to heightened attention in this area. However, most of the previous and current approaches are limited in terms of validity and reliability. Thus, this paper aims to propose a new approach based on The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing validity framework to investigate this matter. The investigation leads to the review of the conceptions of construct validity in educational measurement. The paper concentrates on the proposed validity exploration (VE) model, representing an elaborate enterprise and a serial, progressive procedure aligned with the content and structural validity aspects of The Standards framework. The PISA Computer-based Assessment was used as secondary data for this investigation.