ON THE ISSUE OF THE COMPETENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN, THE MAIN DIFFERENCES FROM CIVIL PROCEDURE

2023

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52425/25187252_2023_29_8
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article deals with the issues of the competence of administrative courts in the Republic of Kazakhstan and in foreign countries. The main attention is paid of the peculiarities of the conduct of administrative proceedings in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The scientific novelty lies in the study of the basic principles of the administrative courts’ organization. The author is of the opinion that every person has the right. His case should be observed by the independent and impartial court. In the article, based on the comparative research method, a brief overview of the competence of administrative courts in the Republic of Kazakhstan and other countries. The main differences between the administrative process and civil proceedings were also identified. The author thinks that the institute of administrative procedures is of particular relevance, especially the analysis of the principles that still remain little explored in the administrative-legal doctrine. Thus, the issue of the competence of administrative courts is due to the sum of the specialized principles as a condition for ensuring citizens' access to justice.