EXPRESSION OF EVALUATION MEANINGS IN THE PRECEDENT NAMES OF THE MEDIA DISCOURSE

2024

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.36078/1715325645
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the features of evaluative meanings and their expression through precedent names. Media discourse, as an important area of language activity, plays a significant role in shaping public opinion. Precedent names found in media texts can not only inform but also influence the perception of the audience by expressing evaluative meanings. Evaluation meanings correlate with the concept of value and can be determined by five criteria: axiological, emotive, objective-subjective, comparative, and contextual. These criteria make it possible to confirm or disprove the peculiarities of the perception of value meanings expressed in the language unit, including in the precedent name. The understanding of the manifestations of evaluative meanings was carried out on the example of precedent names used in media discourse and widely used in Internet publications. The study concluded that the assessment correlates with the presence of value components of the object, which is of particular importance for determining the features of precedent names since their reproducibility is due to the breadth of use associated with the value and significance of the mentioned name. The study of evaluative meanings in the precedent names of media discourse is important for understanding the language mechanisms of forming public opinion and manipulating it in the media space.