Problematic issues of appointment and production forensic psychological and philological examination

2024

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.46914/2959-4197-2024-1-2-24-29
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The appointment and production of forensic psychological and philological examination research in Kazakhstan is carried out on the basis of a list of types of forensic examinations conducted by forensic examination bodies and expert specialties, qualifications for which are assigned by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The issue of the inadmissibility of raising legal issues before an expert in the theory of forensic examination is primarily related to the specifics of the expert’s competence and the subject of forensic examination. The article analyzes legal issues that do not fall within the competence of an expert philologist in the appointment and conduct of a forensic psychological and philological examination in cases of offenses committed verbally – defamation disputes, insults, incitement to discord. Recommended sample questions for these categories of cases are provided.