COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF U-NET, U-NET++, TRANSUNET AND SWIN-UNET FOR LUNG X-RAY SEGMENTATION

Herald of Kazakh-British technical university, 2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.55452/1998-6688-2024-21-2-42-53
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Medical image segmentation is a widely used task in medical image processing. It allows us to receive the location and size of the required instance. Several critical factors should be considered. First, the model should provide an accurate prediction of the mask. Second, the model should not require a lot of computational resources. Finally, the distribution between the false positive and false negative predictions should be considered. We provide the comparative analysis between four deep learning models, base U-Net and its extension U-Net++, TranUNet, and Swin-UNet for lung X-ray segmentation based on trainable parameters, DICE, IoU, Hausdorff Distance, Precision and Recall. CNN models with the smallest number of parameters show the highest DICE and IoU scores than their descendants on the limited-size dataset. Based on the experiment results provided in the article U-Nethas maximum DICE, IoU, and precision. It makes the model the most appropriate for medical image segmentation. SwinU-Net is the model with minimum Hausdorff Distance. U-Net++ has the maximum Recall.