Experimental study and comparison of medical methodology and machine learning models to enhance algorithms for morphological classification of clinical and hematologic syndromes

2024

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/hora61326.2024.10550661
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The dynamic evolution of modern medicine highlights the increasing significance of automating diagnostic procedures. This progression is not solely a matter of convenience but a vital step towards fully leveraging technological advancements, with the goal of elevating both research and clinical outcomes to unprecedented levels. Among the notable advancements in this arena, the emergence of diagnostic systems founded on morphological classification algorithms holds particular prominence. This study compares the performance of different methods, including both traditional medical approaches and modern machine learning techniques. Clinical and hematologic syndromes refer to a broad range of medical conditions characterized by specific sets of signs, symptoms, and laboratory findings. Experimental study and comparison of medical methodology and machine learning models allowed to determine the most effective approaches to morphological classification of clinical-hematologic syndromes, which may lead to improved diagnosis and treatment of patients.